Articles

Cooperation models in the Eastern Asia (on the example of Japan)

Received: 15.05.2023 Published: 15.05.2023

DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2023-104-3-147-155

Full text

Abstract

Limitations of the World Trade Organization system have pushed countries to intensify an independent cooperation agenda through development of bilateral relations outside the WTO. In the international economic space, from the geographical point of view, three basic trade blocs can be identified: the European bloc, the North American bloc and the East Asian bloc, with each having its own way of creating cooperation ties. In East Asia, the Big Three of Northeast Asia (the Republic of Korea, Japan and China) as well as Singapore play leading roles in intensification of cooperative ties. At the same time, Japan was one of the first states in the region that based its cooperation policy on several models that became a template for other East Asian countries. Thus, since 2003 the Republic of Korea has been implementing an FTA strategy and has been applying models of cooperation tested by Japan. Major models include: the «North-South» model, the «Flying Geese» paradigm, the «Core-Periphery» model and the «Hub-and-Spokes» model. It is important to note that models do not function separately, but form integration architecture for the countries, based on the objectives and specifics of cooperative ties. At the same time, the initiator in these forms of cooperation is the corporate sector: for example, keiretsu in Japan and chaebols in the Republic of Korea. Business needs are carried to the state/interstate level and can act as a trigger for establishment of regional trade agreements that allow create vertical and horizontal links determining stability of the international economic structure.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Суханов И.А. Модели кооперации в Восточной Азии на примере Японии // Власть и управление на Востоке России. 2023. Т. 16, № 3. С. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2023-104-3-147-155

For citation:

Sukhanov I.A. Cooperation models in the Eastern Asia (on the example of Japan) // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2023. Vol. 16, no. 3. P. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2023-104-3-147-155

How to Cite

Sukhanov I.A. Cooperation models in the Eastern Asia (on the example of Japan) // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2023. Vol. 16, no. 3. P. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2023-104-3-147-155

References

  1. Аникин В. И. Актуальные стратегии диверсификации деятельности международных корпораций (роль и место в современной мировой экономике) // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2012. № 31. С. 2
  2. Исаченко Т. М. Реформа ВТО: предпосылки, условия, перспективы. // Вестник МГИМО. 2016. № 3 (48). С. 239-248
  3. Кузнецов А. В. Особенности анализа географии зарубежных инвестиций транснациональных корпораций // Балтийский регион. 2016. Т. 8. № 3. С. 30-44. https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2016-3-2
  4. Либман А. М., Хейфец Б. А. Модели региональной интеграции. М.: Издательство: Экономика, 2011. С. 333
  5. Подоба З., Горшков В. Специальная тарифная система Японии: практика применения, Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 5. С.81-91, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-5-81-91
  6. Стрельцов Д., Японский регионализм эпохи Синдзо Абэ через призму ценностного подхода, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, том 63, № 9, 2019. С.38-49. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-38-49
  7. Хейфец Б. А., Чернова В. Ю., Роль России в развитии интеграционных процессов на развивающихся рынках // Экономика региона. 2020. Т. 16, вып. 2 (2020). С. 625-636
  8. Akamatsu K. A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries // Journal of Developing Economies. 1962. Issue 1. Pp. 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1962.tb01020.x
  9. Antràs P., Yeaple S.R. Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade // Handbook of International Economics. Volume 4 / Ed. By G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, K. Rogoff. North Holland, 2014. Pp. 55-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00002-1
  10. Baldwin R., Okubo T.Networked FDI: Sales and Sourcing Patterns of Japanese Foreign Affiliates / NBER. Working Paper No. 18083. 2012. P. 34. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18083
  11. Chong S. Y., Hur J. Small Hubs, Large Spokes and Overlapping Free Trade Agreements. // The World Economy. Volume 31, Issue 12, 2008. Pp. 1625-1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01118.x
  12. Feenstra R.C. Voluntary Export Restraint in U.S. Autos, 1980-81: Quality, Employment, and Welfare Effects. The Structure and Evolution of Recent U.S. Trade Policy. University of Chicago Press. 1984. Pp. 35-66
  13. Fujita M., Thisse J.-F. Globalization and the Evolution of the Supply Chain: Who Gains and Who Loses? //International Economic Review. 2006. Vol. 47. Issue 3. Pp. 811-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00397.x
  14. Ietto-Gillies G. The integration and fragmentation roles of transnational companies // International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III. 2011. P. 66. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806152.00014
  15. Kent Troutman (PIIE), Will Japan Bet the Farm on Agricultural Protectionism, Peterson Institute for International Economics, October, 21, 2014
  16. Kim Heung-jong. 20 Years of FTAs in Korea with KIEP // KIEP. Publisher International, 2021. P. 125
  17. Klose R.C. The Orderly Marketing Agreement with Japan: Implications for U.S. Trade Policy, 3 N.C. J.INT'L L. 246 (1978). P. 247
  18. Kojima K. A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment // Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics. 1973. Vol. 14. Issue 1. Pp. 1-21
  19. Kojima K. The Flying Geese Model of Asian Economic Development: Origin, Theoretical Extensions, and Regional Policy Implications // Journal of Asian Economics. 2000. Issue 11. Pp. 375-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(00)00067-1
  20. Ozawa T. (2005) Institutions, Industrial Upgrading, and Economic Performance in Japan: The "Flying-Geese" Paradigm of Catch-Up Growth, Cheltenham, Glos. U.K.: Edward Elgar: 52-58. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845425678.00010
  21. Schiff M., Winters A. (2003) Regional Integration and Development. DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press. P.139. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5078-1
  22. Suh Jin Kyo, Kim Jong Duk, Park Ji Hyun, Kim Min-Sung, Ahn Dukgeun (2018) Reform of the WTO System and the Direction of Korea's Multilateral Trade Policy (Reshaping the Multilateral Trade Policy for Korea) // [KIEP Research Paper. Policy Analyses]. No. 18-20: 1
  23. Wonnacott R. J. (2011) Preferential liberalization in a huband-spoke configuration versus a free trade area Mezhdunarodnyy spravochnik po ekonomike integratsii [International Handbook on the Economics of Integration]. Vol. I: 150. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805995.00016