Социально-экономическое сотрудничество стран Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона

Transformation of institutional instruments in the NEA Countries: South Korea

Received: 15.10.2020 Published: 15.10.2020

DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2020-93-4-8-15

Full text

Abstract

The current socio-economic situation in the North-Eastern Asia is closely related to overcoming the consequences of unprecedented shocks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the countries of the region. First of all, it determined the widespread practice of forming and implementing operational anti-crisis programs aimed at minimizing the risks of social development. At the same time taking place both on the nationally and globally level a significant change in the conditions of activity has caused the need to adjust strategic development projects, adapt and transform the used socio-economic models to the “new reality”. This process is especially important for the systemic economies of the region (Chinese, Japanese, South Korean), in which active institutional transformations are taking place, aimed at increasing the efficiency of economic development in the new conditions, strengthening the competitive positions of countries in the regional and world markets. The content the strategic institutional project «The Korean New Deal», developed in July 2020, and a comparative analysis of its main provisions with the social and economic government programs implemented in the Republic of Korea in the last decade are examined in the presented article.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

М. Рензин О., В. Кучук В. Трансформация институционального инструментария в странах Северо-Восточной Азии: Южная Корея // Власть и управление на Востоке России. 2020. Т. 13, № 4. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2020-93-4-8-15

For citation:

М. Рензин О., В. Кучук В. Transformation of institutional instruments in the NEA Countries: South Korea // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2020-93-4-8-15

How to Cite

М. Рензин О., В. Кучук В. Transformation of institutional instruments in the NEA Countries: South Korea // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2020-93-4-8-15

References

  1. Агабеков С. И., Левина Е. А. Корпорации и экономический рост. Опыт Южной Кореи // ЭКО. 2017. № 3. С. 134–146.
  2. Асмолов К. В. Политика государств Корейского полуострова в области борьбы с коронавирусом // Проблемы ДВ. 2020. № 3. С.40–52.
  3. Зотин А. Рецепт сноровки покорейски // Коммерсантъ-Деньги. 2014. № 19. С. 47.
  4. Канг Т. В. Станет ли Южная Корея еще одной Японией // США-ЭПИ. 1990. № 9. С. 92–101. С. 97.
  5. Кукла М. П. Республика Корея: на пути к креативной экономике // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2016. № 9. С. 27–32.
  6. Обзор международной практики поддержки экономики и населения в условиях борьбы с пандемией коронавируса в Армении, Великобритании, Германии, Дании, Испании, Италии, Казахстане, Китае, Нидерландах, США, Финляндии, Франции, Швеции, Южной Корее, Японии. М.: ВШЭ. 2020. 72 с.
  7. A UN Framework for the immediate socio-economic response to COVID-19. United Nations. 2020. 51 c.
  8. Byung-il Choi. Global Value Chain in East Asia Under «New Normal»: IdeologyTechnology-Institution Nexus // East Asian Economic Review. Vol. 24. No. 1. 2020. Рp. 3–30.
  9. Global Economic Prospects. June 2020. World Bank Group. 2020. 238 p.
  10. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Fifth edition. International Labor Organization. June 2020. 22 p.
  11. Kang T. W. Is Korea the Next Japan N.Y. The Free Press. 1989. 196 p.
  12. The Korean New Deal. National Strategy for a Great Transformation. Government of the Republic of Korea. July 2020. 71 р.