Articles

Environmental responsibility in the context of the effectiveness of social managementin the scientific institution

Received: 10.02.2023 Accepted: 22.02.2023 Published: 15.03.2024

DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2024-107-2-64-72

Full text

Abstract

In the article the authors prove the relevance of developing environmental responsibility management in the context of social responsibility of scientifi institutions in Russia. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that till today the experience and problems of introducing relevant activities in scientifi institutions of the Russian Federation have not been properly studied. A complex of general scientifi (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) and specifi scientifi research methods (comparative analysis, content analysis and in-depth interview) were used in the work. The following results were obtained: it was revealed that in practical activities scientifi institutions create a certain burden on the natural environment and their functioning creates specifi environmental risks. The authors consider the experience of managing environmental responsibility of 98 scientifi institutions in Russia based on website materials. It was established that, on the one hand, most scientifi institutions publish materials that in one way or another show a responsible attitude towards environmental problems, including taking into account the real and potential harm caused in the process of research activities. On the other hand, the specifi formulation of environmental policy of a scientifi institution is still an extremely rare phenomenon. Taking into account the best Russian and international experience, the authors propose the foundations of a systematic approach to establishing environmental responsibility management in Russian scientifi institutions, aimed at comprehensively improving the effi of social management. In the conclusion it is stated that environmental responsibility, combined with the effectiveness of social management of a scientifi institution, is an important aspect of sustainable development and insurance of favorable environment. The introduction of a systematic approach to managing environmental responsibility in scientifi institutions allows us to achieve the following results: preservation of the environment; improvement of the scientifi institutions’ social image; improvement of the quality and effectiveness of scientifi research; improvement of social interaction with the public and the stakeholders.

Keywords

Received: 10 February 2023 · Revised: 20 February 2023 · Accepted: 22 February 2023

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Салогуб А.М., Арсельгова М.А. Экологическая ответственностьв комплексе эффективности социального управления научным учреждением // Власть и управление на Востоке России. 2024. Т. 17, № 2. С. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2024-107-2-64-72

For citation:

Salogub A.M., Arselgova M.A. Environmental responsibility in the context of the effectiveness of social managementin the scientific institution // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2024. Vol. 17, no. 2. P. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2024-107-2-64-72

How to Cite

Salogub A.M., Arselgova M.A. Environmental responsibility in the context of the effectiveness of social managementin the scientific institution // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2024. Vol. 17, no. 2. P. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2024-107-2-64-72

References

  1. Асташина, Н. И., Камерилова, Г. С. Научно-исследовательская экологическая деятельность в свете современных требований университетского образования // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. 2017. Т. 6. № 1(18). С. 107–110.
  2. Гагарина, С. Н., Еськова, Е. С. Социальная ответственность бизнеса в контексте устойчивого развития // Экономика и бизнес: теория и практика. 2021. № 6–1(76). С. 32–35.
  3. Данилова, Л. С. Трактовка социальной ответственности бизнеса и смежных понятий в российских научных исследованиях // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2020. №4 (60). С. 130–136.2.
  4. Ефимова, О. В., Рожнова, О. В. Методология исследования корпоративного раскрытия социальной ответственности бизнеса: информационная база и этапы проведения // Учет. Анализ. Аудит. 2021. Т. 8. № 6. С. 6–20 https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2021-8-6-6-20
  5. Жолобова, И. К., Шаповал, Г. Н. Актуальные проблемы социальной и профессиональной ответственности ученого // Гуманитарные и социально-экономические науки. 2016. № 1(86). С. 17–21.
  6. Курносова, Т. И. Отечественный и зарубежный опыт использования ESG-принципов в разработке стратегии развития нефтегазового бизнеса // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. 2022. № 1. С. 387–410 https://doi.org/10.18334/err.12.1.1 14058
  7. Мантаева, Э. И., Голденова, В. С., Слободчикова И. В. Стандарты ESG-концепции устойчивого развития // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2023. Т. 242. № 4. С. 93–104 https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2023-242-4-93-104
  8. Ростовская, Т. К., Шабунова, А. А., Багирова А. П. Концепция корпоративной демографической политики российских организаций в контексте социальной ответственности бизнеса // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2021. № 5. С. 151–164 https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.9
  9. Салогуб, А. М., Арсельгова, М. А. Социальная ответственность научных учреждений как фактор обеспечения конкурентоспособности и национально-технологического суверенитета России // Caucasian Science Bridge. 2023. №2 (20). С. 13–22 https://doi.org/10.18522/2658-5820.2023.2.1
  10. Шемякина, Т. Ю. Применение ESG-факторов в инвестиционных строительных проектах // Вестник университета. 2021. № 3. С. 132–139 https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-3-132-139
  11. Ясвин, В. А. Экологическая политика в сфере формирования культуры: цели и результаты // Социально-политические исследования. 2020. №4 (9). С. 147–156 https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-428Х-2020-4-9-147-156
  12. Atkins J., McBride, K. (2023) Paradigm shift or shifting mirage? The rise of social
  13. and environmental accountability Handbook of Accounting, Accountability and Governance,
  14. pp. 168–194 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886544.00017
  15. Gigauri, I., Vasilev, V. P. (2023) Paradigm Shift in Corporate Responsibility to
  16. the New Era of ESG and Social Entrepreneurship Sustainable Growth and Global Social
  17. Development in Competitive Economies, pp. 22–41 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-
  18. 8810-2.ch002
  19. Glonti, V., Trynchuk, V., Khovrak, I., Mokhonko, G., Shkrobot, M., Manvelidze,
  20. L. (2020) Socialization of organization sustainable development based on the principles
  21. of corporate social responsibility Montenegrin Journal of Economic, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.
  22. 169–182 https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-1.11
  23. Lisovsky, A. L. (2022) Transition to Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis of Factors
  24. Motivating Industrial Companies to Implement ESG Practices Strategic decisions
  25. and risk management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 262–272 https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947-
  26. X-2021-3-262-272
  27. MacNeil, I., Esser, I. M. (2022) From a fi nancial to an entity model of ESG European
  28. Business Organization Law Review, vol. 23, no.1, pp. 9–45 https://doi.org/10.1007/
  29. s40804-021-00234-y
  30. Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Woon, L. F., Haider, M., Waqas, A. (2024) Integrating
  31. ESG disclosure into the relationship between CSR and green organizational culture toward
  32. green Innovation Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 20, № 2, pp. 288–304 https://
  33. doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2023-0125
  34. Taliento, M., Netti, A. (2020) Corporate social/environmental responsibility and
  35. value creation: refl ections on a modern business management paradigm Business Ethics
  36. and Leadership, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 123–131 https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(4).123-
  37. 131.2020
  38. Tolley, R. (1996) Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of commuting
  39. Journal of transport Geography, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–217 https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-
  40. 6923(96)00022-1
  41. Verslycke, T., Wait, D. (2016) Data quality in natural resource and environmental
  42. damage litigation Nat. Resources & Env’t, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 15–19.
  43. Astashina, N. I., Kamerilova, G. S. (2017). Scientifi c research environmental activities
  44. in the light of modern requirements of university education Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi
  45. zhurnal [Baltic Journal of Humanities], vol. 6, no. 1 (18), pp. 107–110 (in Russ.)
  46. Gagarina, S. N., Eskova, E. S. (2021). Social responsibility of business in the context
  47. of sustainable development Ehkonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika [Economics and
  48. business: theory and practice], no. 6–1, pp. 32–35 (in Russ.)
  49. Danilova, L. S. (2020). Interpretation of social responsibility of business and related
  50. concepts in Russian scientifi c research Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I.
  51. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after. N. I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences], no. 4 (60), pp. 130–136 (in Russ.)
  52. Efi mova, O. V., Rozhnova, O. V. (2021). Research methodology for corporate disclosure
  53. of social responsibility of business: information base and stages of implementation
  54. Uchet. Analiz. Audit [Accounting. Analysis. Audit], no. 8(6), pp. 6–20. https://doi.
  55. org/10.26794/2408-9303-2021-8-6-6-20 (in Russ.)
  56. Zholobova, I. K., Shapoval, G. N. (2016). Current problems of social and professional
  57. responsibility of a scientist Gumanitarnye i sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskie nauki
  58. [Humanities and socio-economic sciences], no. 1, pp. 17–21 (in Russ.)
  59. Kurnosova, T. I. (2022). Domestic and foreign experience in using ESG principles in
  60. developing an oil and gas business development strategy Ehkonomika, predprinimatel’stvo
  61. i pravo [Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law], no. 12(1), pp. 387–410 (in Russ.) https://
  62. doi.org/10.18334/err.12.1.1 14058
  63. Mantaeva, E. I., Goldenova, V. S., Slobodchikova, I. V. (2023). Standards for the
  64. ESG concept of sustainable development Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ehkonomicheskogo obshchestva
  65. Rossii [Scientifi c works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], no. 242(4), pp.
  66. 93–104 (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2023-242-4-93-104
  67. Rostovskaya, T. K., Shabunova A. A., Bagirova A. P. (2021). The concept of corporate
  68. demographic policy of Russian organizations in the context of social responsibility of
  69. business, Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 14(5), 151–164 https://
  70. doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.9 (in Russ.)
  71. Salogub, A. M., Arselgova, M. A. (2023). Social responsibility of scientifi c institutions
  72. as a factor in ensuring competitiveness and national technological sovereignty of Russia.
  73. Caucasian Science Bridge, no. 2(20), pp. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.18522/2658-5820
  74. .2023.2.1 (in Russ.)
  75. Shemyakina, T. Yu. (2021). Application of ESG factors in investment construction
  76. projects. University Bulletin, no. 3, pp. 132–139. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-
  77. 2021-3-132-139 (in Russ.)
  78. Yasvin, V. A. (2020). Environmental policy in the sphere of cultural formation:
  79. goals and results. Socio-Political Research, no. 4(9), pp. 147–156. https://doi.
  80. org/10.20323/2658-428Х-2020-4-9-147-156 (in Russ.)
  81. Atkins J., McBride, K. (2023) Paradigm shift or shifting mirage? The rise of social and environmental accountability Handbook of Accounting, Accountability and Governance, pp. 168–194 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886544.00017
  82. Gigauri, I., Vasilev, V. P. (2023) Paradigm Shift in Corporate Responsibility to the New Era of ESG and Social Entrepreneurship Sustainable Growth and Global Social Development in Competitive Economies, pp. 22–41 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8810-2.ch002
  83. Glonti, V., Trynchuk, V., Khovrak, I., Mokhonko, G., Shkrobot, M., Manvelidze, L. (2020) Socialization of organization sustainable development based on the principles of corporate social responsibility Montenegrin Journal of Economic, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 169–182 https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-1.11
  84. Lisovsky, A. L. (2022) Transition to Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis of Factors Motivating Industrial Companies to Implement ESG Practices Strategic decisions and risk management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 262–272 https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947-X-2021-3-262-272
  85. MacNeil, I., Esser, I. M. (2022) From a financial to an entity model of ESG European Business Organization Law Review, vol. 23, no.1, pp. 9–45 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00234-y
  86. Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Woon, L. F., Haider, M., Waqas, A. (2024) Integrating ESG disclosure into the relationship between CSR and green organizational culture toward green Innovation Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 20, № 2, pp. 288–304 https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2023-0125
  87. Taliento, M., Netti, A. (2020) Corporate social/environmental responsibility and value creation: reflections on a modern business management paradigm Business Ethics and Leadership, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 123–131 https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(4).123-131.2020
  88. Tolley, R. (1996) Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of commuting Journal of transport Geography, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–217 https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(96)00022-1
  89. Verslycke, T., Wait, D. (2016) Data quality in natural resource and environmental damage litigation Nat. Resources & Env’t, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 15–19.