Modern science and practice widely uses the concept of «human capital» when discussing both the general strategic tasks of transforming an industrial civilization on the way to the formation of a post-industrial, information society, and practical guidelines for the growth of a post-industrial economy, current social transformations and social management systems, corresponding to these general tasks. A broad interdisciplinary managerial discourse of human capital concerns all these areas. The issues of the human capital development index and quality of life indicators are paid special attention to. At the same time, practical functioning of the concept “human capital” and ambiguities in attempts to reflect it cause many problematic situations. Accordingly, the author of the article considers the philosophical and methodological reflection of the «human capital» concept no less relevant. In the context of dialectic of the historical and logical, tradition and innovation, the logic of «transitive» transition, transdisciplinary approach, philosophical and linguistic analysis, etc., the author joins the established interdisciplinary discourse of human capital and stresses the importance of clarifying the essential meanings of the linguistic construct «human capital». Analysis of logic of its historical formation and correlation with the concepts of “man”, “human integrity”, “human potential”, “labor resource”, etc., fixed in the scientific thesaurus, allow us raise questions of clarifying the scientific status and subject boundaries of this concept, which is the sphere of economy. According to the author when the concept of «human capital» is beyond its limits, it acquires the status of a metaphor or an oxymoron. This is evidenced by both the discourse positions and the existential risks of its scientific use in humanitarian sphere.
Арутюнян М.П
Тихоокеанский государственный университет
Publications of the author
In the journalSpiritual and moral potential of Russia in self-preservation of the value world of culture
М.П. Арутюнян
he author addresses civilizational challenges and existential risks of techno-genic civilization; mechanisms of destruction of its spiritual values; characterizes crisis phenomena of modern education is discussed. It connects them with the loss of formation of its anthropological essence, destruction of the worldview paradigm and the dominance of technological strategies. When discussing “advancing education”, justifies the importance of education ontological integrity of phenomena of “man”–”world”–”education”–”culture”. The spiritual and moral potential of Russia in the self-preservation of the value world of culture, referring to the national cultural and historical tradition of self-preservation of forms of a holistic worldview in the context of Russian philosophy, the potential of classical religions of Russia, folk cultures, experience of ethnic and inter-confessional communication is characterized. Raising questions of activation of a subjective factor of modern history and culture, the author raises the questions of need, on the one hand, to improve the system of management, activating the available positive and life-affirming achievements of civilization, and, with another, – to effectively resist to the available destructive tendencies of its self-development.
