Социально-экономическое сотрудничество стран Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона
Integration processes in the Asia-Pacific region: features and potential of expansion
Received: 15.07.2020 Published: 15.07.2020
DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2020-92-3-20-31
Full text
Abstract
In the article, based on the analysis of theoretical and empirical studies, the features of integration processes in the Asia-Pacific region are determined, and the economic potentials of the large trade blocks in the sub-global economy are compared. The author shows that the noticeable results of the trade and economic ties expansion between the key countries of the Asia-Pacific region became possible by the production fragmentation and the trade barriers reduction. The assessment indicated that the weighed import duty in the trade interactions between the Asia-Pacific countries was characterized by the lower values compared to the other countries. The Asia-Pacific countries have a hidden potential for trade barriers increasing. It is shown that the main reason of the trade agreements expansion between the Asia-Pacific countries is to avoid the negative consequences of non-participation in such agreements. In the terms of economic, demographic and trade scales, the comparative potentials of various mega-formats in the Asia-Pacific region are shown. The author shows that only one trade mega-format was created in the sub-global economy, because the contradictions between the Asia-Pacific countries. The lack of mutual initiatives for a free trade zone creation between the United States and China significantly slows down the integration processes in the AsiaPacific region. It is shown that in the long term, Russia may face a competitive choice in integration with the Asia-Pacific countries, which can join either the “pro-American” or “proChinese” large trade blocs.
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
For citation:
How to Cite
References
- Изотов Д. А. Торговая интеграция в АТР: структурные особенности и динамические проявления // Известия ДВФУ. Экономика и управление. 2016. №3. С.86–100. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.163479
- Изотов Д. А. Эффекты присоединения России к мегаформатам АТР // Известия ДВФУ. Экономика и управление. 2016. №4. С.83–95. DOI: 10.5281/ zenodo.220685
- Ando M. Fragmentation and vertical intra-industry trade in East Asia // North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2006. Vol. 17. Pp. 257–281.
- Baldwin R. A Domino Theory of Regionalism. NBER Working Paper 4465. September 1993, https://www.nber.org/ papers/w4465 (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Baldwin R. Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade. NBER Working Paper 12545. September 2006, https://www.nber.org/papers/ w12545 (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Baldwin R., Okubo T. Networked FDI: Sales and Sourcing Patterns of Japanese Foreign Affiliates. NBER Working Paper No. 18083, 2012, https://www.nber. org/papers/w18083 (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Bergsten C. F., Noland M., Schott J.J. The Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific: A Constructive Approach to Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism. ADBI Working Paper 336. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2011, https://www.adb.org/ publications/free-trade-area-asia-pacificconstructive-approach-multilateralizingasian-regionalism (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Beshkar M., Bond E. W., Rho Y. Tariff binding and overhang: Theory and evidence // Journal of International Economics. 2015. Vol. 97. Issue 1. Pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.004.
- Fergusson I. F., McMinimy M. A., Williams B. R. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): In Brief. Congressional Research Service. February 9, 2016, https://fas.org/ sgp/crs/row/R44278.pdf. (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Fujita M., Gokan T. On the Evolution of the Spatial Economy with Multi-unit Multi-plant Firms: The Impact of IT Development. Institute of Developing Economies. Discussion Paper No.16. November 2004, https://www.ide.go.jp/ English/Publish/Download/Dp/016.html (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Fujita M., Mori T. Frontiers of the New Economic Geography // Papers in Regional Science. 2005. Vol. 84. Issue 3. Pp. 377–405.
- Hayakawa K., Jinji N., Matsuura T., Yoshimi T. Costs of Utilizing Regional Trade Agreements. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 19-E-054. July 2019, https://www. rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/19e054.pdf (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Kimura F., Ando M. Two-dimensional fragmentation in East Asia: Conceptual framework and empirics // International Review of Economics and Finance. 2005. Vol.
- Issue 3. Pp. 317–348. 14. Li C., Wang J., Whalley J. Numerical General Equilibrium Analysis of China’s Impacts from Possible Mega Trade Deals. NBER Working Paper 20425. August 2014, https://www.nber.org/papers/w20425 (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Petri P.A. Multitrack Integration in East Asian Trade: Noodle Bowl or Matrix? // Asia Pacific Issues. October 2008. No. 86. Honolulu: East-West Center, https:// www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/ multitrack-integration-east-asian-tradenoodle-bowl-or-matrix (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Rodrik D. What Do Trade Agreements Really Do? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2018. Vol. 32. Issue 2. Pp. 73–90. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.2.73
- Thorbecke W. Enjoying the Fruits of their Labor: Redirecting exports to Asian consumers. RIETI. Discussion Paper Series 15-E-016. February 2015, http://www. rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/15e016.pdf (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
- Whalley J. Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements? NBER Working Paper 5552. April 1996, http://www.nber. org/papers/w5552.pdf (дата обращения 01 октября 2020).
