This article presents a brief analysis of the Japanese legislative acts' provisions which aim at eliminating or minimizing conditions facilitating corrupt behavior of public servants including a review of basic legal acts regulating a state (civil) service, establishing prohibitions and restrictions in the service activity of officials, providing prevention of interests’ conflict and abuse or committing other illegal activities by officials of states structures. It was shown measures of criminal or disciplinary nature adopted national Law against offenders. It was also shown main directions of activity and functions of the specialized state bodies authorized for detection and suppression of corruption offenses. It was also told about an institute of whistleblowers having an important role for revealing offences and whose activities is provided by Law, and whistleblowers’ information about corruption facts is considered by law enforcement bodies as a reason to begin a formal investigations.
Филиппов В.В.
Дальневосточная Академия государственной службы
Publications of the author
In the journalLegal regulation of countering corruption in the sphere of New York city’s public service
В. Филиппов
Public formations in struggle with the official and economic crimes in the USSR in 1950 – 60 s
В. Филиппов
The experience of the USA on using of polygraph in the organs of the state power for reveal of the abuses and others corruption crimes in the article is analyzed. It’s illustrated the lawmaking and enforcement efforts of Russian authorities for using of polygraph testing for the struggle with corruption in the state authority sphere.
The article describes the main directions of activity and functions of the state law enforcement and control bodies of the USA on counteraction and investigation of the corrupt crimes. The references and arguments of the Laws regulating the rights and charges of the governmental agencies are given.
The article describes bribery, abuse of power, embezzlement and misappropriation of state and public property by Soviet officials who held various posts in the government, commercial organizations, and law enforcement agencies in the 1950-1960s. The author examines the links between crime prevention and socio-economic processes . The article also focuses on the mutual influence and on the country as a whole in the Far East during these years
The article analyzes how crimes are perpetrated and describes their characteristics and methods of deception in the sphere of budgetary expenditures for state and municipal requirements. The profiles of offenders are also examined.
