Terminology ratio of the labor conflict and service dispute in the internal Affairs bodies

Abstract

The article considers the correlation of the terms "labor dispute" and "service dispute in the internal Affairs" in science and jurisprudence. The authors note that the regulation of public-service relationship differs from labor in that the participants generally have different scope and focus of power. The term "state service in bodies of internal Affairs" has not yet found wide application. The analysis of the terms "service dispute in the internal Affairs bodies" and "labor dispute" has the undoubted value of the relative linguistic representation of scientific theories associated with the expression of numerous conceptual structures of thinking that are activated in the process of creation and development of the theoretical framework of the service in bodies of internal Affairs. However, evidence of a semantic coincidence of the concepts of "labor dispute" and "service dispute" is not available. The most correct in terms of theoretical and practical legal discourse is the use of the terms "service dispute in the internal Affairs bodies" or "service-labor dispute".